for completed actions

 

Exercises

          

Other terminology: aspectual particle ""

 

1. When should I use it?

 

When you want to express that an action is completed. Normally should be placed after main verbs or at the end of sentences.

HE  

măi  le  

   

BUY LE

sān     zhāng   piào

      张      

THREE  ZHANG  TICKETS

He has bought 3 tickets.

SHE 

bă jiŭ       ná  lái                le 

                        

BA  WINE   TAKE (TOWARDS) LE

She has brought the wine.                  

 

2. When should I place the at the end of a sentence, and when should I place it after the main verb of a sentence?

 

1.  If the object of a sentence is a simple one i.e. a noun, which is not attached to a number

and measure word, and not attached to a descriptive clause ( clause), can be placed at the end of the sentence. In this case the particle has many functions: it may indicate the completed action, or a change of situation, it may also indicate an imminent action.

s.             v.     o.  le

wŏmen chī  fàn     le

          .

WE         EAT  MEAL LE

We have eaten.. [Completed action]

Now we are eating. (We didn't eat before.) [Change of situation]

We are about to eat. ( .)

 

3. Is it incorrect if I place after the verb in a simple-object sentence?

 

No, it is not incorrect, but it seems as if the sentence is not yet finished. It may look like the first clause of the verb......construction. For example (Also see pattern 5.),

tā   chī  le   fàn...      (jiù qù kàn diànyĭng)

   ...      (     .)

HE  EAT  LE  MEAL...     (JIU GO  SEE   FILM)

After he finishes the meal...(he'll go to see a film.)

 

4. Can I place at the end of a sentence that has a complex object? 

No. If the object of a sentence is a complicated one, i.e. it is preceded by a number word and measure word, or a descriptive clause, is placed after the main verb of the sentence.

s.  v.  le    num. mw.    o.

tā  chī  le   liăng  wăn    fàn                      

           .

HE EAT LE  TWO  BOWLS  RICE

He has eaten two bowls of rice.

 

5. Where should I place if a sentence has a time measure?

 

If an action is attached to a time measure (e.g., duration , length of time) or an action measure (e.g., many times), is placed after the main verb. The following three alternative patterns share the same feature, that is, they have after the main verbs.

s.                    v.        le tm.(am.)   de  o.            (le)

HE

xué        le liăng nián  de  zhōngwén  (le)

                      (*)

STUDY   LE   TWO    YEAR  DE   CHINESE   (LE)

He studied Chinese for 2 years.

s.             v.      o.                 v.   le    tm.(am.)   (le)

tā         xué  zhōngwén 

               

xué  le liăng niăn (le)  

       ()

o.                    s.             v.    le   tm.(am.)   (le)

zhōngwén       tā 

            

nà ge diànyĭng wŏ

那个      

xué  le  liăng niăn  (le)

          ()

kàn le  liăng biàn  (le)

        (**)

I have watched that film twice.
 

nà     shì wŭ nián qián de shì         le                   wŏmen shì duō    nián     de lăo péngyou le

     是五                 .                 我们                       .

THAT IS FIVE YEAR AGO DE MATTER LE                        WE          ARE MANY YEARS  DE  OLD FRIEND  LE

That incident happened 5 years ago  We have been old friend for many years.

 

6. Is a time measure placed after in a negative sentence?

 

No, negative sentences of this kind are normally in a different word order. The time-measure should be placed before the negation. For instance, if you want to say: "I haven't eaten Chinese food for ages." It should be in the following word order:

s.                    tm.                            neg.             v.       o.                le  

 

I  

hăo jiŭ    

  

LONG TIME  

méi      

NOT 

chī     zhōngguó cài   le 

             

EAT     CHINESE  FOOD  LE

I haven’t eaten Chinese food for a long time.

      

7. Do I have to put the time-measures before in all negative sentences?

 

No. If you want to deny an affirmative statement which has a time-measure, then the time-measure should be placed after the main verb.

s.  neg.  v.    tm.      o.      

wŏ méi xué sān nián zhōngwén,    wŏ zhĭ  xué     le liăng nián

         ,        只学     .

I  NOT LEARN 3  YEAR  CHINESE,           I  ONLY  LEARN LE  2   YEAR)

 I didn't learn Chinese for 3 years, I only did for 2 years.         

 

8. Do I have to put after every verb in a sentence, if the sentence has a sequence of actions?

 

If a sequence of actions in the sentence are completed, is usually placed after the last verb of the sentence.

s.                  v.1  o.1                   v.2            le  (tm.    )              o.2

 

HE

qù  zhōngguó          

GO   CHINA     

xué     le   sì  nián      jīngjù

             

STUDY LE  FOUR YEAR  PEKING OPERA 

He went to China to study Peking opera for 4 years.

 

 

HE

qù  zhōngguó          

GO   CHINA    

măi   le  cí qì

  瓷器

BUY  LE   CHINA

He went to China and bought some China.

 

If you leave at the end of sentences, it normally indicates a change of the situation. Let's compare the following two sentences:

 

1. (Completed action)          tā qù zhōngguó xué     le zhōngwén

                                           他去中              

                                           HE GO  CHINA       STUDY LE  CHINESE

                                           He went to China and studied Chinese.

 

2. (Change of situation)      tā qù zhōngguóxuézhōngwén  le   

                                         他去中               .

                                                HE GO  CHINA     STUDY CHINESE  LE

                                         He has gone to China to study Chinese. (He's not here)

 

9. Do I always have to place after the last verb of a sentence when describing a sequence of actions?

 

No. There is another sentence pattern, which indicates sequence of actions, but the first sequence in the sentence is conditional. In this sentence  pattern is placed after the first verb which is in the conditional clause, and the adverb is placed before the second verb of the sentence. This kind of construction has a sense of urgency, which means that the action in the clause takes place immediately after the completion of the first action.

s.  v.1 le  o.1           jiu v.2         o.2

tā  dào le  zhōngguó jiù zhăo       péngyou.

                  .

HE  ARRIVE LE  CHINA  JIU LOOK FOR FRIEND

He'll look for friend immediately after he arrives in China.

As you can see, that sentence describes the action in future, but if you place another at the end of the sentence, then it means that both actions have taken place.

                                

10. Do I always have to use to indicate a completed action?

 

No, not always. First of all, the particle for completed action is not used in negative sentences. Instead should be placed before the main verb of the sentence.

s. mei    v.  o.

tā  méi   chī fàn.

  .

HE NOT   EAT MEAL

He didn't eat the meal.

 

11. Apart from the negation, are there any circumstances in which is not used?

 

In the following situations the particle for completed actions is not used.

1. is not used for prolonged and regular actions in the past. In other words, if the sentence contains words such as 每天,年年,常常...  the particle for the completed action is not used.

 

wŏ yĭqián      zài zhōngguó jiāoshū

我以                .

I  IN THE PAST IN   CHINA      TEACH

I taught in China in the past.

 

qùnián       wŏ chángcháng gēn  wŏ nǚ péngyou qù kàn diànyĭng

去年                        我         .

LAST YEAR   I      OFTEN           WITH MY GIRLFRIEND    GO SEE  FILMS

Last year I often went to see films with my girlfriend.

 

2. is not used in sentences which have modal verbs such as 应该, (dei), 可以, , , , , or for verbs which indicate feelings such as ,喜欢, 觉得, 知道, 愿意, .

zuótiān         nĭ   yīnggāi qù kàn  tā

昨天            应该      .

YESTERDAY  YOU  SHOULD GO SEE HIM

You should've gone to see him yesterday.

              

shí nián yĭqián  tā    hĕn  xĭihuān  chī  făguó   cài

十年 以前                 法国    .

TEN YEAR AGO  SHE  VERY  LIKE      EAT FRENCH FOOD

Ten years ago she liked eating French food very much.

 

3. is not used when , , * are the main verbs of sentences.

shàng xīnqī  tā  zài        bĕijīng

    星期          .

LAST   WEEK HE  WAS (IN) BEIJING

He was in Beijing last week.

 

yĭqián   tā     yŏu   hĕn  duō   qián

以前                    .

BEFORE  HE    HAD  VERY  MUCH MONEY

In the past he had a lot of money.

 

If (to posses) is used as the main verb of a sentence, (for completed action) is not used. However, can be used if the object of a sentence is an abstract one which has an implication of action, such as “development”, “improvement” 他的学习有了很大的进步. He has improved greatly in his studies.

 

4. is not used for direct and indirect speeches.

dir. speech      zuótiān        tā wèn wŏ:  "nĭ  yào     qù zhōngguó ma"

                      昨天          他问    :  "              ?"

                     YESTERDAY     HE ASK ME:  "YOU WANT  GO CHINA      MA?"

                      Yesterday he asked me: "Would you like to go to China?"

indir. speech   zuótiān        tā wèn wŏ:  yào   qù zhōngguó ma

                                               .

                       YESTERDAY   HE ASK  ME  WANT GO  CHINA       MA

                      Yesterday he asked me if I would like to go to China.

 

As you can see, in the situations when the completed action is not used, time-words are used to indicate the actions happened in the past.

 

12. Is it true that if I use a time-word I don't have to use ?

 

No. Time-words are needed when the completed action cannot be used. But time-words have no effect on when the completed action is applicable.                                                             

zuótiān       wŏ qù măi  le  liăng bĕn shū

          去买        本   .

TESTERDAY   I    GO BUY  LE  TWO BEN BOOK

Yesterday I went out and bought two books.

You can't say:

zuótiān  wŏ qù măi liăng bĕn shū

     去买      .

 

The above sentence sounds uncompleted. The listener would expect more and would ask, "and then what?"

 

13. Are there any constructions that cannot take an aspectual particle ?

 

The completed action is not applicable to the following constructions.

 

1. The V+ construction (the complement of degree)

zuótiān      tā fàn       zuò  de hĕn   bú cuò

                 

YESTERDAY HE MEAL COOK DE VERY NOTBAD

Yesterday he cooked meal very well.

 

2. Description+ (The verbs in the descriptive clause don't take , as they are not the main verbs of sentences.)

 

zuótiān      wŏ măi de  nà   bĕn  shū   hĕn     yŏu yìsi

昨天                           意思.

YESTERDAY I  BUY  DE   THAT BEN BOOK VERY  INTERESTING

The book which I bought yesterday is very interesting.

 

14. Do I always have to consider the use of when I see a past tense in an English sentence?

 

No, not always. Remember: the in this section is for completed actions, which is different from the past tense. Here is another example of a past tense English sentence which does not use the completed action :

qùnián      wŏ fēicháng máng.

去年             .

LAST YEAR   I  VERY      BUSY

Last year I was very busy.

 

The word busy acts as a stative verb which does not take the particle of completed action. 

 

Exercises 

You can submit your work online here

Click here for answers

 

A. Place "" in the right in the following sentences, and give your reasons if is not needed.

 

1.         昨天我去____大使馆办____签证____.

 

2.         我已经请____小王看____两次电影  ,可是他还是那么不客气____. 真气人____!

 

3.         上星期我去____北京看____朋友____.

 

4.         去年我常常在____路口的那家书店看____.从来没有人管________.

 

5.         前天晚上我在____你那儿吃____饭的时候,我听见____她拉____小提琴拉____得真好听____.

 

6.         十年前我在____中国住____ .

 

7.         我研究____计算机研究____四年____.

 

8.         那本书我已经看____三次____.

 

B. Translate the following sentences into Chinese.

 

1.         Yesterday Xiao Wang asked me to borrow a Chinese newspaper from the library for him.

2.         For three months Mr. Li has been teaching me how to sing Peking Opera.

3.         I've been living in this country for more than four years.

4.         We've gone through this lesson twice, but the teacher wants us to go through it once more.

5.         She is unhappy. She hasn't eaten for two days.

6.         He should have returned that tea-set a long time ago.

7.         Last month he said that he wanted to go to China, but this month he said that he wanted to go to Japan. I really don't know where he wants to go.

8.         In the past I was the only one who did the cooking.

9.         Last year he often helped me to learn Chinese.

10.     Should we go to the hospital to see Xiao Zhang immediately after finishing our work?

 


 

* He has been learning Chinese for 2 years.

 

** The at the end of the sentence indicates that the action is still going on. In this usage, brings the time "up to the present". This usage of only works when a time-measure or an implication of a time-measure is involved in the sentence. in the following examples have the similar function, which brings the time "up to the present".