As a 16-year-old myself I happen to agree that many
teenagers my age can be vile and agressive. I,
however, place the blame for this entirely on the
doorstep of their parents and the ridiculously
politically correct society in which we live, where
almost all manners of effective discipline have been
removed. I also find it extremely upsetting that as
a teenager me and my well mannered friends, all of
whom would give up their seats on a bus for elderly
people or stop to help someone in need, are treated
as if we are to be avoided and labelled teenage
thugs. I have often tried to start conversations
with older people on buses about local issues or
even just the weather but usually either get
completely ignored or a look from them as if I have
done something wrong by talking to them.
Paul
Russell, Warwick
I feel safe living in China, despite the teeming
millions of people. I have yet to see a gang of yobs
similar to those which seem to frequent so many
streets in London. I have never felt threatened ..
despite being the intended victim of theft. Of
course there is crime, I live in a massive city
which is far bigger than London, but young people's
behaviour is generally of a much higher standard
than in England. Society has taken a turn for the
worse in England and the young are a part of that.
Perhaps China just lags behind a few years. I hope
they never catch up. Rodd Morgan, Guangzhou,
China
That girls are getting worse is only an
inevitable consequence of their new equality with
boys. You can't give girls the same freedoms and
moral codes as boys without expecting them to
behave, to a certain extent, as boys always have.
Marianne Park, Cambridge
My 18 year old son is rude,arrogant and lazy but
thinks he is wonderful. He is the image of me at the
same age. I grew up so will he. David Lee,
Salford
As a first-year undergraduate at Durham
University, I am obviously lucky in receiving some
of the best education in the UK, and furthermore, my
fellow students must be some of the brightest
around; it's safe to say that in my college,
probably less than ten people smoke, I have never
seen a trace of any drugs and there are certainly no
gangs of hooded, abusive teenagers here. Yet every
time I return home I am shocked at the increasing
numbers of teenagers lingering on street corners
with nothing to do, apart from kicking footballs at
bus stops and shouting insults as you go by. My
point is this – surely articles like "Slugs and
snails? Not today's boys" are rather generalised, as
are most of the comments in this debate? Surely it
is unfair to categorise teenagers into two camps of
either good or bad, and in fact the real picture
across the UK is much more garbled and diverse – as
it always has been? Does it not depend on education,
the families that teenagers grow up with, the
friendships they form, the area they live, the
opportunities (or lack of) that they can take on,
and the challenges in today’s media-frenzied society
that they might face? I certainly find the media
portrayals of all young people in the UK as being
abusive, bullying and aggressive as highly offensive
– it has definitely never been a part of my life,
something that I give full credit for to my parents.
Yet I realise that abusive groups of teenagers do
exist, and indeed that their behaviour is becoming
increasingly and unnecessarily atrocious. But please
- don’t judge us depending on just one good, or
indeed one extremely miserable encounter concerning
a few teenagers that you may have experienced.
Jennifer Coxon, Durham
In the course of my studies at university I found
a letter to a newspaper dated 1909 complaining about
gangs of young people drinking at local parks.
Things never change. In some ways, nowadays, the
problem is self-perpetuating. When I lived in London
people moaned about the number of young people on
the streets but then blocked every attempt at
providing them with things to do, even when these
were privately funded schemes. Simon Parker,
Coventry
It seems significant that the people complaining
are the ones who are no longer young. It is easy to
blame all society's ills on young people, and
perhaps the reason some (but far from the majority)
are badly behaved is because our aging population
hates youth at the same time as pursuing it
relentlessly. I find the idea that we are
inarticulate, violent, abusive, foul-mouthed and
immoral deeply offensive and wildly inaccurate. Most
of the everyday rudeness I experience is from older
people, and yet no one seems to think that
unreasonable or cause for concern. Pot and kettle,
I'm afraid. Lucy Longhurst, Oxford
All I would say is that anyone who still thinks
the average teenager is redeemable has yet to take a
walk through any one of innumerable town centres or
inner city estates at night. Pontificating from the
sidelines is easy. Try taking the walk. Helen
James, London
A number of contributors to the debate on teenage
behaviour have used the term "the youth of today" as
a central tenet to their argument. While I believe
that some teenagers in today's society are very
hostile and do act in ways that would be viewed as
antisocial by many, there are also those who fit the
more desirable criteria. Many are indeed well
mannered, take on high degrees of responsibility and
are currently, or will be in the future, an asset
and valuable contributor to society. It could be
that teenagers are more rapacious and disruptive in
today's world due to corruptive media influences,
but also that we as a society value individuality
and uniqueness, allowing people to exercise choice
and flexibility in their own lives. Such
"individuality and choice" may mean that some choose
to be destructive (and these we should help), others
on the other hand constructive (and these we should
applaud), but wide-ranging generalisations and
stereotypes will not solve problems. It is therefore
specific individuals and their activities that
should be targeted. Marcin Roth, London