Translate the following into Chinese.
China's land grab is undermining grassroots democracy
After continuous confrontation between villagers and local officials for
almost four months, the land grab in the fishing village of Wukan, in Guandong
province, China, has now led to the death of one of the elected village leaders
in police custody, and further escalated into a violent "mass incident" with
tens of thousands of farmers protesting against local officials.
The Wukan case is just one of many mass incidents China has experienced in
recent years. In fact, the number keeps rising every year; journalists often
cite a figure of 87,000 for 2005, estimates by the China Academy of Social
Sciences give a figure of "over 90,000" mass incidents in 2006, and further
unspecified increases in 2007 and 2008.
In China, a mass incident is defined as "any kind of planned or impromptu
gathering that forms because of internal contradictions", including mass public
speeches, physical conflicts, airing of grievances, or other forms of group
behaviour that may disrupt social stability. Among China's mass incidents, more
than 60% have been related to land disputes when local governments in China
worked closely with manufacturers and real-estate developers to grab land from
farmers at low prices.
In a drive to industrialise and urbanise, thousands of industrial parks and many
thousands of real estate development projects have been, or are being, built at
the costs of dispossessed farmers. The land requisition system deprives three to
four million farmers of their land every year, and around 40-50 million are now
dispossessed.
The Wukan case says a lot about the serious tension between state and society in
the fast urbanising China. It is difficult to play the land requisition game
fairly under the current system, since farmers are neither allowed to negotiate
directly on the compensation package, nor are they allowed to develop their own
land for non-agricultural purposes. They have to sell their land to local
government first, which defines the price then leases the land to industrial and
commercial/residential users for a profit. As land prices keep rising in China,
it is not surprising that farmers with rising expectations are becoming
increasingly unhappy. As a result, mass incidents, sometimes as violent as in
Wukan, are inevitable.
Local authorities in China, in their pursuit of revenue via aggressive
urbanisation and industrialisation, are also undermining the country's
grassroots democracy. It was usually local officials who would carry out
difficult negotiations with village collectives, or who were in charge of
coercing defiant farmers to accept government terms. Having village cadres who
shared their interests would not only lower the selling price but also determine
whether or not the transaction could take place at all. Therefore, township and
county officials in localities that experienced greater land requisition had a
stronger incentive to manipulate village democracies to make sure that more
co-operative cadres were elected.
One township party secretary I interviewed in Fujian province said: "If election
rules are followed strictly, [we] will lose control of the rural society.
Village cadres will be afraid of villagers, not the township government. They
can put off assignments from the township government and compromise the tasks
during implementation. Therefore … local officials are willing to introduce
rules that subvert the true meaning of village democracy. This is also the case
in Wukan in which farmers are protesting not only against local governments, but
also against villager cadres who worked with the authorities in abusive land
requisition.
As China is urbanising fast, land requisition takes place in more Chinese
villages, in particular those closest to the cities. Farmers with rising
expectations on the one hand, and local officials with financial stakes in
keeping the compensation low on the other, are bound to lead to increasingly
violent mass incidents. Local governments in China needs to spend more not only
on compensating farmers, but also on maintaining social stability. Wukan should
be a signal for China to reform its land requisition system in order to keep
local governments away from the financial gains of abusive land taking.