Translate the following into Chinese
Should we despair at the kids of today?
I hadn't been back to my old school for 35 years.
But the new BBC One series The Editors invited me to consider a question I posed
on this blog. And the answer, I thought, might be found in the place I spent my
teenage years.
You may recall the post -
it asked whether the teen
rebel is now a dying breed. I rattled off a string of statistics suggesting
that youth behaviour (despite all the headlines) is far better than in my day.
Sex, drugs, booze, fags, crime - teenage problems with these have all fallen
hugely in the past few years.
Problems persist, of
course, but the current crop of young people may be the most compliant since
youth culture was born last century. And I think we need to consider why.
So, I am retracing a
journey I took countless times as a teenager. The walk up the hill to
Peter Symonds College in Winchester is
familiar and strange in equal measure. Neglected synapses fire in warm
recognition with each stride, but stepping back into my past is also
disconcerting.
The landscape doesn't match
my mental picture. New buildings alter and obscure views; there are unsettling
alterations to once habitual trails; doorways to classrooms have been bricked up
and reconfigured. (An elephant might feel like this when discovering a hotel has
been built across his ancient migration route.)
The cavernous school hall,
where I had quivered at the sight of dyspeptic masters in mortar boards and
gowns, has become a welcoming pastel-carpeted management hub for a college that
now teaches 3,600 sixth formers.
I spot the old headmaster's
chair, once the seat of school authority, tucked in a corner. In a meaningless
act of subversion, I pull it out and sit on it.
It isn't just the scenery
that is different. The relationship between the adolescent and adult world has
changed too.
I have brought some archive
film of teddy boys, mods and rockers, hippies, punks and skinheads to show to
the students. They smile at the sight of teenagers putting two pubescent fingers
up at the older generation, but the footage is treated like source material in a
20th Century history class. A few appear to be taking notes.
I confide to them how I
felt as a teenager when I first heard Anarchy in the UK by the Sex Pistols.
"It was an epiphany," I
suggest, improbably. "I remember feeling that at last I had found music which
reflected my anger and frustration at the way my parents' generation were
running the world. The music and fashion of my day were designed to annoy the
grown-ups," I explain.
The young faces are etched
with what I take to be incomprehension, but may actually be pity.
When I ask them to suggest
why they don't behave like that, a number of theories emerge.
One is that they are all
too busy to rebel. A couple of the students say that the uncertainties of a job
market, where employers routinely reject all but the best graduates, mean
studies cannot be neglected. The persecuted swot of the past is often now
celebrated as a model of geek chic.
I conduct an unscientific
survey of Peter Symonds' students. Of the 337 teenagers who agree to answer my
questions, almost two-thirds (64%) say studying is more important than hanging
around with friends. Nine out of 10 think they are under more pressure than
their parents to succeed academically.
Another explanation put
forward for their generally conformist behaviour is that teenage subversion has
itself been subverted by consumerism. "We buy what we are told to buy," one girl
claims. "Capitalism has won."
Perhaps it has in the sense
that the electronic gadgets and media tools flogged by global corporations now
occupy huge chunks of their spare time. There is far less reason for a teenager
to be bored, less opportunity for mischief or nuisance if they are in their
bedrooms on Facebook or online gaming.
When I was a teenager, we
did lots of hanging around. The Facebook of my day was the bus shelter. Research
suggests that in the 1990s, about half of British teenagers spent most evenings
out with their peers. Our survey of the Peter Symonds students finds, in that
school at least, the figure is now closer to one in five.
Social media has also given
today's teens a voice. "That is what the 60s and 70s rebels were all about," a
boy tells me. "Young people wanted to be heard. Now we have that voice through
Facebook and Twitter."
It is an interesting point.
New technology gives young people an opportunity to engage with wider society on
equal terms. Teenagers are free to participate, protest and petition online.
In the 1970s, when I was a
teenager, we defined ourselves in contrast to our parents' generation. We placed
ourselves outside - literally and figuratively. Today's young people are not the
same.
They still profess to feel
different. My survey finds 84% agreeing their values are different to their
parents' generation. "[But] these days, a teenager's mum and dad will often
share the same tastes in music and in fashion," Sussex University historian Dr
Lucy Robinson tells me.
As if to prove the point,
when we go to Winchester University students' union midweek "bop", one girl
politely introduces me to her parents who have come along with her. The
generation gap has been bridged.
It is not just the subtle
changes to the city's architecture that discombobulate me. Meeting some of
today's teenagers in the place where I spent my adolescence, I find myself
admiring their self-discipline and generosity while regretting the apparent
muting of youthful challenge and confrontation.
Perhaps I am deluding
myself. In the 70s, I may have occasionally put gel upon my hair, smeared
mascara upon my eyes and arranged a sneer upon my lip, but I was really a
middle-class grammar school boy masquerading as part-time punk.
The demonization of youth,
which has so disfigured the relationship between adults and young people in
Britain, has always been based on an urban myth. Teenagers became an easy
scapegoat for an establishment spooked by rapid social change. True rebels were
few and far between.
But I do think it is time
we stopped kidding ourselves. Today's young people are, generally, behaving very
well. And given how badly some of their parents behaved, that may be what
contemporary teenage rebellion looks like.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21922893